musique
» the trolls at the waterpark
karkat: he wears too much sunblock and slips multiple times on the pavement
aradia: she doesn't even swim she just gets food from the concession stand and sits with sollux the whole time
tavros: he gets stuck in a float tube and circles the lazy river about 20 times before gamzee finds him and helps him out
sollux: he brought his husktop with him and got it wet
nepeta: went in the lazy river rapids with equius and fell out and got seperated from him. just curled up on the lounge for the rest of the day. she hated the water. equius insisted she go.
kanaya: she spent half the time searching for equius because he refused to put on sunblock. also went on the 70 foot tall waterslide that drops straight down. didn't scream. she is strong.
terezi: went on the dragon themed water slide about 10 times until vriska made her stop
vriska: layed in the sun for half the trip tanning. tried to flip tavros in the lazy river. tripped karkat. made terezi stop going on the dragon themed waterslide. then took a nap. she was almost left behind until tavros went back and got her.
equius: refused to put on sunblock because he is STRONG. ended up getting sunburned all over his body. couldn't move for 3 days.
gamzee: he went on all the rides. all of them. his face paint washed off and he got upset for 2 seconds before seeing the lazy river. floated in it until he saw tavros and helped him out.
eridan: he didn't wanna go. feferi made him. he was upset the entire time. had to reform his hair after it fell flat when he got out from a waterslide.
feferi: she didn't leave. police had to come. she never left. shes still there. swimming, 3 days later. eridan is worried. the police gave up. she is too strong

marianascosta:

hire me, crewniverse 

catnippackets:

took a break from homework to doodle a Sock

vastderp:

terezees:

WE’RE BACK, BABY

image

YESSSSSS

Plays:
71,102 plays

phemiec:

toastyhat:

thepagejakeenglish:

image

(by the way it’s legit guys!)

i JSUT SAW THE STEVEN UNIVERSE/?????? AND???

WHAT

WHAAHTA
WHHWAHAyYYAYTTT

NO

NOT OK

WHOTSTNO
NO

Are you going to dress up on Halloween?
Anonymous

sockswithsandwiches:

we have a few ideas.

miss-azura:

these are the things that my mind wanders off about 

amaranthica:

Ok I have a bit of an idea that I’ve been working on and I think it would make a good compromise for something that’s been debated about for a long time.

The biggest argument against legalizing gay marriage is the whole “preserving the sanctity of marriage” thing, right?

So, what if the term “marriage” were to be completely be pulled from the government and all rights associated with it? Instead, the tax benefits and recognition as a couple is replaced by the term “civil union”, with ANY situation. It’s just the term for what a couple is in the eyes of the government. Two males, two females, one male one female, or one or more androgynous individuals, it doesn’t matter. Everything is called a civil union, with no discrimination as to who can apply. The requirements should simply be two consenting adults.

And as for the term “marriage”, that should be restricted solely to the whole religious ceremony with the pastor and the Bible that’s tied to the church, and have no rights whatsoever tied to it.

This way the church can keep their traditional definition of marriage, yet everybody has equal rights regardless.

I think this would be a good solution for everyone.

I’d like to discuss this if anyone has any legitimate problems about this solution, so if you have any I’d be happy to talk to you in a civil manner!

REBLOG | Posted 6 days ago With 3 notes + Ori. Via

Ok I have a bit of an idea that I’ve been working on and I think it would make a good compromise for something that’s been debated about for a long time.

The biggest argument against legalizing gay marriage is the whole “preserving the sanctity of marriage” thing, right?

So, what if the term “marriage” were to be completely be pulled from the government and all rights associated with it? Instead, the tax benefits and recognition as a couple is replaced by the term “civil union”, with ANY situation. It’s just the term for what a couple is in the eyes of the government. Two males, two females, one male one female, or one or more androgynous individuals, it doesn’t matter. Everything is called a civil union, with no discrimination as to who can apply. The requirements should simply be two consenting adults.

And as for the term “marriage”, that should be restricted solely to the whole religious ceremony with the pastor and the Bible that’s tied to the church, and have no rights whatsoever tied to it.

This way the church can keep their traditional definition of marriage, yet everybody has equal rights regardless.

I think this would be a good solution for everyone.